B-265852:
Dec 29, 1995
A firm protested an Army contract award for food and dining attendant services, contending that the Army improperly: (1) evaluated its past performance; and (2) downgraded its bid based on the suspicion that it did not intend to hire the incumbent contractor's employees. GAO held that the Army reasonably: (1) evaluated the protester's past performance in accordance with the stated evaluation crite...