[Protest of Navy Solicitation and Contract Award]

B-262035: Jul 20, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protester a Navy solicitation and contract award, contending that the Navy should have: (1) issued the solicitation as a small business set-aside; (2) defined the best-value award factors; and (3) made award to it, since it offered a lower price. GAO held that the protester: (1) untimely filed after bid opening its protest of the Navy's failure to set aside the solicitation and define the award factors; and (2) failed to state a valid basis for protesting. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here