B-262016.2,B-262016.3: Feb 15, 1996

A firm protested an Army contract award for a patient monitoring and clinical information system, contending that the Army: (1) unfairly excluded it from competition by tailoring solicitation amendments to benefit the awardee; and (2) improperly and unequally evaluated the technical proposals. GAO held that: (1) the protester untimely filed after bid opening its protest of alleged solicitation imp...

B-262016.2,B-262016.3: Feb 15, 1996

Protest alleging that the awardee's proposal does not meet the solicitation's technical requirements is denied where agency found that awardee's proposal evidenced compliance with the specifications and the protester has not shown that agency's conclusion was unreasonable. Which was issued by the Walter Reed Army Medical Center for a patient monitoring and clinical information system with turnkey...