B-261476.3:
Nov 14, 1995
A firm protested a proposed Army contract award for radio equipment, contending that the Army improperly: (1) determined its ability to timely meet the solicitation's requirements; and (2) evaluated the awardee's responsibility. GAO held that the Army reasonably determined that the: (1) protester could not meet the solicitation's delivery schedule; and (2) awardee was the only source capable of ti...