[Protest of Army Solicitation]

B-261258: May 23, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army solicitation for construction, contending that the Army improperly set it aside for small disadvantaged businesses (SDB), since the: (1) contract's value was too high; and (2) project fell under standard industrial classification codes that were excluded by regulation from the SDB set-aside program. GAO held that the: (1) procurement was not exempt from the SDB set-aside program; and (2) Army properly set the procurement aside for SDB. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Oct 9, 2020

Oct 8, 2020

Oct 2, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here