[Protest of Army Contract Award for Moving Services]

B-260278.3: Aug 16, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for moving services, contending that the: (1) awardee did not have the proper license at the time of bid opening; and (2) Army improperly delayed award so that the awardee could obtain the license. The protester also requested payment under its current contract. GAO held that the: (1) protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest; and (2) protester's payment request was a matter of contract administration which it would not consider. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here