[Protest of GPO Contract Award for Copying]

B-259695: Feb 27, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Government Printing Office (GPO) contract award for copying services, contending that GPO should have: (1) made award to it; (2) reimbursed it for the costs of leasing a required copier; and (3) compensated it for overestimating the scope of work under two previous contracts. GAO held that the: (1) protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest; and (2) issue of GPO estimated requirements under previous contracts was a matter of contract administration, which it would not review. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Nov 14, 2018

Nov 9, 2018

Nov 8, 2018

Nov 7, 2018

  • CDO Technologies, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest because it is untimely where it was filed more than 10 days after CDO knew or reasonably should have known the bases for its protest.
  • Protection Strategies, Inc.
    We deny the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here