[Protest of Army Contract Award]

B-259509: Dec 12, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award, contending that the awardee's bid prices: (1) were too low; and (2) failed to account for a collective bargaining agreement wage escalation rate, other fringe benefits, and certain contractual and legal requirements. GAO held that the: (1) protester failed to provide a valid basis of protest, since the awardee could propose an extremely low bid price; and (2) Army's acceptance of the awardee's bid price was an affirmative determination of the awardee's responsibility which it would not review, since the protester failed to show that the Army acted in bad faith or failed to follow definitive responsibility criteria. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Mar 9, 2018

Mar 7, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here