[Protest of Army Contract Award]

B-259189: Jan 5, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award, contending that the Army should have rejected the awardee's bid, since it: (1) misrepresented itself when it failed to furnish complete information regarding its debarments, suspensions, and responsibility; and (2) was not a responsible contractor. GAO held that: (1) the awardee did not intentionally mislead the Army regarding its performance history; (2) it would not review the affirmative responsibility determination, since the protester could not provide evidence of fraud or bad faith. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 28, 2020

Oct 27, 2020

  • Silver Investments, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest as untimely because it was filed more than 10 days after the protester knew, or should have known, the basis for its protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here