[Protest of Army Contract Award]

B-259189: Jan 5, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award, contending that the Army should have rejected the awardee's bid, since it: (1) misrepresented itself when it failed to furnish complete information regarding its debarments, suspensions, and responsibility; and (2) was not a responsible contractor. GAO held that: (1) the awardee did not intentionally mislead the Army regarding its performance history; (2) it would not review the affirmative responsibility determination, since the protester could not provide evidence of fraud or bad faith. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here