[Request for Reconsideration of Protest of Navy Subcontract Award]

B-257673.2: Jun 13, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest of a Navy subcontract award for fire alarm system rehabilitation. GAO had held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the award, since the Navy was not directly involved in the procurement. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that the: (1) subcontract award was subject to GAO review, since the prime contractor was a construction management contractor; and (2) awardee's bid should have been rendered nonresponsive, since the awardee failed to properly complete its bid schedule. GAO held that: (1) it was not clear whether the prime contractor acted as a construction management contractor; and (2) the awardee's failure to complete the bid schedule was a minor informality that did not affect its lump-sum bid price. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here