[Protests of Army Contract Award for Muzzle Velocity Systems]

B-257244,B-257244.2: Jul 25, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for muzzle velocity systems, contending that the: (1) Army improperly made award to the awardee, since its product failed to meet some of the solicitation's testing requirements; and (2) Army's retesting plan was inadequate. GAO held that the protester: (1) failed to show that the Army's evaluation of the awardee's bid was improper; and (2) untimely filed its protest of the Army's retesting plan more than 10 working days after it learned the basis of protest. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Oct 9, 2020

Oct 8, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here