[Protest of Army Contract Award for Recreational Facility Operation]

B-256681: May 27, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for recreational facility operation, contending that: (1) the awardee was not a small disadvantaged business and was ineligible for award; (2) it did not have an reasonable opportunity to submit a responsive bid, since the solicitation's specifications were defective; and (3) the Army failed to hold meaningful discussions with it regarding apparent deficiencies in its bid. GAO held that the: (1) protest was academic, since the Army resolicited the requirement as a small business set-aside; and (2) protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Nov 25, 2020

Nov 24, 2020

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here