[Protests of NARA Contract Award for Security Services]

B-254392.10,B-254392.11,B-254392.12,B-254392.13,B-254392.8,B-254: Feb 9, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Three firms protested a National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) contract award for security guard services, contending that NARA unreasonably evaluated the bids. GAO held that: (1) the solicitation did not state that award would be made solely on the basis of the bidder's level of compensation; (2) the awardee's training costs were feasible, since as the incumbent contractor it employed experienced guards who would require less training that other bidders' personnel; (3) NARA held meaningful discussions with all bidders; (4) NARA did not relax the performance requirements for the awardee; (5) there was no evidence that NARA acted in bad faith in determining the awardee's responsibility; (6) one protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after it knew the basis of protest; (7) NARA reasonably evaluated the bidders' proposed personnel in accordance with the solicitation's evaluation criteria; and (8) NARA made a reasonable price-technical tradeoff and determined that the low bid represented the best value to the government. Accordingly, the protests were denied in part and dismissed in part.

Oct 30, 2020

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 28, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here