[Protest of Army Contract Award for Collective Protection Equipment and Parts]

B-253921.4: Jul 10, 1995

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for collective protection equipment and parts, contending that: (1) the Army did not follow competitive procurement procedures; (2) it was placed at a competitive disadvantage; and (3) the contract was awarded improperly. GAO held that the protester: (1) had prior notice that the Army had awarded a portion of the contract to the other firm; (2) untimely filed its protest more than 10 working days after it knew the basis of protest; and (3) was not an interested party to protest the contract award, since it did not qualify as an actual offeror under the solicitation. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here