[Protest of Army Contract Award for Food Services]

B-251912: May 11, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for food services, contending that: (1) the award was inconsistent with the solicitation specifications; and (2) discussions were inadequate. GAO held that the Army: (1) properly based its award decision on the solicitation's evaluation criteria; (2) awarded the contract to the bidder that was the most advantageous to the government, not the low, technically acceptable bidder; and (3) adequately advised the protester that its bid deficiencies required correction. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here