[Protests of Air Force Contract Award for Training Aircraft]

B-248540.4,B-248640: Sep 14, 1992

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Air Force contract award for training aircraft, contending that the: (1) Air Force unreasonably excluded its bid from the competitive range; and (2) contract award violated a domestic-source requirement. GAO held that the: (1) Air Force reasonably determined that the protester's bid was technically unacceptable; and (2) protester was not sufficiently interested to challenge the Air Force's acceptance of the awardee's bid. Accordingly, the protest was denied in part and dismissed in part.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here