[Protest of Marine Corps Contract Award for Ship Maintenance]

B-246236.6,B-246236.7,B-246236.9: Jan 24, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Marine Corps contract award for maintenance of shipboard equipment, contending that the Corps: (1) performed an improper cost realism analysis of the awardee's bid; (2) improperly determined that the awardee was the low bidder; and (3) improperly permitted the awardee to base its cost cap on a labor agreement that might not be enforceable. GAO held that the: (1) Corps reasonably accepted the awardee's proposed cap on direct labor expenses and differentiated between capped and non-capped labor as part of its cost realism evaluation; (2) awardee's cost cap was not contingent on the enforcement of its labor agreement; (3) Corps clearly understood the impact and limitations of the awardee's proposed cap; (4) Corps sought expert advice on the legality of the awardee's labor agreement; and (5) Corps reasonably evaluated the awardee's proposed costs. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here