A firm protested the Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) cancellation of a solicitation and subsequent resolicitation for construction, contending that FWS did not have a compelling reason to cancel the solicitation. GAO held that FWS properly cancelled the solicitation, since the line-item price limitation was ambiguous. Accordingly, the protests were denied...

Was placed in the solicitation in a misleading manner. Peak contends that the agency did not have a compelling reason. As is required. " and explained in numerous sub paragraphs how bids were to be composed. Which is entitled "Payment. When 5 percent of the original contract amount is earned. Less all previous payments will be made. When 10 percent of the original contract amount is earned. Less a...