[Request for Reconsideration of Protest Against Navy Solicitation]

B-243989.9: Jun 24, 1991

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against a Navy solicitation for suspension bands. GAO had held that the protester untimely filed its initial protest regarding solicitation specifications. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that the general timeliness rule was not applicable. GAO held that since the protester failed to provide evidence of its timeliness at the time of its initial protest, it was not entitled to consideration of the merits of its protest. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here