[Protests of Army Contract Award for Claims Management Services]

B-242616,B-242616.2: May 28, 1991

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for construction claims management services, contending that the Army improperly: (1) evaluated bids; and (2) selected a higher bidder. GAO held that the: (1) protester timely filed its protest regarding cost evaluation after receiving information it requested under the Freedom of Information Act; (2) protester untimely filed its protest regarding technical proposal evaluation more than 10 working days after it became aware of the basis for protest; (3) Army reasonably evaluated sample task cost instead of total contract cost, since the sample task provided a common basis for cost evaluation; and (4) Army reasonably determined that the awardee's technically superior proposal was worth its higher bid. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here