[Request for Reconsideration of Dismissed Protest Against Navy Contract Award]

B-241035.2: Dec 5, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against a Navy contract award for computer services. GAO had held that the protest was academic, since the Navy: (1) terminated the contract; and (2) intended to resolicit best and final offers based on the revised specifications. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that: (1) the Navy's corrective action was improper; and (2) it was entitled to reimbursement for its bid and protest preparation costs. GAO held that the: (1) Navy's termination of the contract rendered the protest academic; and (2) protester was not entitled to reimbursement for its bid and protest preparation costs. Accordingly, the dismissal was affirmed and the claim for costs denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here