https://www.gao.gov/products/142045

B-239858.2: Aug 16, 1990

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against the Army's rejection of its bid, contending that: (1) it timely filed its protest; (2) the protest should not have been dismissed, since GAO assigned it a file number; and (3) GAO improperly informed the Army of its protest file number. GAO held that the protester did not show that the initial decision was in error. Accordingly, the...

https://www.gao.gov/products/448773

B-239858.2: Aug 16, 1990

PROCUREMENT - Bid Protests - GAO procedures - GAO decisions - Reconsideration DIGEST: Prior decision is affirmed where protester does not show that initial decision dismissing protest as untimely was in error. The Army informed CDSC that "the technical merit of its proposal does not merit funding and will not be considered for award.". Which was received in our Office on May 25. Because CDSC faile...