A firm protested an Army contract award for missile system maintenance, contending that the Army: (1) failed to evaluate the awardee's experience in accordance with the evaluation criteria; and (2) did not require any letters of committment of proposed personnel and improperly concluded that the awardee's proposed staffing was acceptable. GAO held that: (1) there was no basis to conclude the Army'...

General Accounting Office will not object to evaluation of technical and cost proposals where review of source selection documents shows that the evaluation was fair and reasonable and consistent with the evaluation criteria in the solicitation. Although solicitation provided that technical and management factors were more important than cost. Where the contracting officer reasonably determines th...