B-239223:
Aug 10, 1990
A firm protested an Army contract award for missile system maintenance, contending that the Army: (1) failed to evaluate the awardee's experience in accordance with the evaluation criteria; and (2) did not require any letters of committment of proposed personnel and improperly concluded that the awardee's proposed staffing was acceptable. GAO held that: (1) there was no basis to conclude the Army'...