B-238384:
May 4, 1990
A firm protested a Navy contract award for lease of a photogrammetry system, contending that: (1) the solicitation specifications were unduly restrictive; and (2) its system met end-product requirements. GAO held that the: (1) Navy did not deliberately exclude any firms from competition; and (2) protester's product would not adequately meet the Navy's needs. Accordingly, the protest was denied...