B-238117.2: Aug 17, 1990

A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against the General Services Administration's delivery terms for tables. GAO had held that the protester failed to show that the delivery terms were unreasonable or inconsistent with applicable regulations. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that: (1) GAO failed to find the destination requirement unnecessary to satisfy the g...

B-238117.2: Aug 17, 1990

Does not establish any error of law or provide information not previously considered is denied. We denied the protest because Interior failed to show that the contracting officer's decision to require f.o.b. destination delivery for conference tables was unreasonable or inconsistent with applicable regulations. Were most advantageous to the government. Offerors were required to submit prices on an...