B-237987:
Apr 3, 1990
A firm protested two Army contract awards for artillery fuzes, contending that: (1) the Army improperly evaluated option prices; (2) the Army improperly calculated evaluation factors for the use of government-furnished property; (3) the Army improperly evaluated technical proposals; and (4) one awardee's bid was unbalanced. GAO held that the: (1) Army properly interpreted the solicitation as a who...