https://www.gao.gov/products/141062

B-237987: Apr 3, 1990

A firm protested two Army contract awards for artillery fuzes, contending that: (1) the Army improperly evaluated option prices; (2) the Army improperly calculated evaluation factors for the use of government-furnished property; (3) the Army improperly evaluated technical proposals; and (4) one awardee's bid was unbalanced. GAO held that the: (1) Army properly interpreted the solicitation as a who...

https://www.gao.gov/products/464664

B-237987: Apr 3, 1990

" contracting agency reasonably included in the evaluation the prices for option quantities of artillery fuzes that were not included in the basic requirement. Where evaluation under technical evaluation criteria for proposed facilities and production approach was based on detailed information in proposal and in-plant survey. Protester's disagreement with agency determination that awardee's approa...