[Protest of Army Contract Award for Pyrotechnic Support Services]

B-237522: Feb 23, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for engineering and technical services, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably evaluated its proposal; (2) accepted its first best and final offer; (3) untimely advised it of its proposal deficiencies; (4) was not authorized to reopen discussions 6 months after receiving best and final offers; and (5) failed to respond to its questions. GAO held that the: (1) Army reasonably found the protester's proposal unacceptable, since the protester refused to offer fixed labor rates; and (2) protester untimely protested the other alleged improprieties. Accordingly, the protest was denied in part and dismissed in part.

Dec 12, 2019

Dec 11, 2019

Dec 9, 2019

Dec 5, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here