B-237180:
Jan 17, 1990
A firm protested the Army's rejection of its bid for armed guard services, contending that the: (1) Army unreasonably determined that it was nonresponsible; (2) Army's nonresponsibility determination effectively debarred it; and (3) Army improperly proceeded with the contract award during the instant protest. GAO held that the: (1) Army reasonably determined that the protester was nonresponsible;...