[Appeal of Claims Group's Disallowance of CIA Employee's Claim for Hazardous Duty Differential Pay]

B-236269: Nov 16, 1989

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee appealed his denied claim for hazardous duty pay, contending that a safety survey supported his allegations about the unsafe conditions of the construction area he was required to monitor. GAO held that CIA reasonably determined that the claimant's exposure to working conditions typical of construction sites did not warrant hazardous duty pay. Accordingly, the claim was denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here