[Second Request for Reconsideration of Dismissed Protest Under Air Force Solicitation for Electrical Power Portion of Radar System]

B-235761.5: Feb 28, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against an Air Force contract award for electrical power. GAO had held that the protester: (1) untimely filed its original protest; and (2) was not sufficiently interested to protest. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended by reiterating its original contentions that: (1) the awardee was not responsible; and (2) GAO should consider its protest as a significant issue. GAO held that the: (1) original protest was untimely and did not constitute a significant issue; and (2) protester was not sufficiently interested to protest the award. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here