[Request for Reconsideration of Successful Protest Against DGSC Contract Award]

B-235431.4,B-235431.5,B-235431.6: Jan 29, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) requested reconsideration of a GAO decision to: (1) sustain a contract award protest under a DLA solicitation for solid fuel bars; and (2) recommend that DLA suspend the awardee's contract performance, terminate the contract, and resolicit. In its request for reconsideration, the protester requested that GAO terminate the awardee's contract and award it the contract without resolicitation, since it alleged that the awardee's bid was nonresponsive. In its request for reconsideration, the awardee contended that the protester untimely protested after bid opening, since alleged specification ambiguities were apparent prior to bid opening. In its request for reconsideration, DLA requested that GAO modify its recommendation that DLA terminate and resolicit the contract, since: (1) it urgently needed the required product; and (2) it would incur unreasonable termination costs. GAO held that: (1) it was not feasible to terminate the contract and resolicit, given the cost and the urgent need for the product; (2) it would not review the awardee's arguments, given its decision not to terminate the contract; and (3) the protester was entitled to reimbursement for its bid and protest preparation costs. Accordingly, the original decision was modified.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here