B-234711: Jun 15, 1989

A firm protested a Navy contract award for a milling machine, contending that the: (1) awardee's machine did not meet the solicitation's domestic-content requirement; and (2) Navy should not have considered machine accessories in determining domestic content. GAO held that the: (1) solicitation defined accessories as part of the machine; and (2) Navy properly accepted the awardee's product. Accord...

B-234711: Jun 15, 1989

A & D contends that Foxco does not meet the RFP's requirement that the machine be manufactured in the United States or Canada and asserts that accessories of the machine should not have been considered in making that determination. Which was issued on July 15. Offerors were required to certify the percentage and dollar amount of foreign components contained in their machines. The accessories were...