https://www.gao.gov/products/137731

B-233166: Jan 18, 1989

A firm protested any Air Force contract award for computer maintenance services, contending that the Air Force improperly: (1) precluded it from competing, since the Air Force knew that it was available; and (2) terminated its original contract for default, since it had the resources to efficiently perform the contract. GAO held that: (1) the Air Force properly limited competition due to its urgen...

https://www.gao.gov/products/437766

B-233166: Jan 18, 1989

Agency reasonably determined protester was not a potential source for a 12 -month. Who was terminated for default on the previous contract for the solicited services. General Accounting Office will not consider the propriety of the procuring agency's decision to terminate a contract for default. Since this is a matter for the procuring agency's board of contract appeals under the contract disputes...