[Protests of Army Rejection of Offers for Drayage Services]

B-233125,B-233126,B-233127: Jan 24, 1989

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Army's rejection of its offers for drayage services, contending that the Army improperly rejected its offers for failure to acknowledge and respond to solicitation amendments, since its failure to receive the amendments resulted from the Army's deliberate attempt to exclude it from competition. GAO held that the: (1) protester failed to show that the Army deliberately attempted to exclude it from competition; and (2) Army and protester had no knowledge of the mailing error until bid opening. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here