B-232646: Jan 12, 1989

A firm protested the Air Force's partial rejection of its bid for general dental services, contending that its use of dentists whose names other bidders previously submitted was not improper, since the substitute dentists had passed a credentials review. The Air Force contended that the protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 working days after it knew its basis for protest. GAO held tha...

B-232646: Jan 12, 1989

Where the agency's and the protester's versions of the facts conflict concerning when the protester was orally notified that part of its offer was considered unacceptable. The General Accounting Office will resolve doubt over whether the protest was timely filed within 10 days of that notification in the protester's favor. Protester's interpretation of a clause in a solicitation for dental service...