B-232500.5:
Jun 15, 1989
A firm protested an Army contract award for facility operation, maintenance, and repair, contending that the Army: (1) did not evaluate the proposals against stated criteria, since it improperly made award to a higher bidder; (2) did not hold meaningful discussions; (3) failed to conduct a proper cost-realism analysis; and (4) failed to consider its incumbent status in evaluating company backgroun...