B-232307.2:
Mar 7, 1989
A firm protested an Army contract award for technical support services, contending that the Army: (1) improperly evaluated its proposal; (2) should have awarded it the contract, since its bid was low; and (3) improperly awarded the contract at a higher cost, since there was no significant difference between its proposal and the awardee's. GAO held that the Army properly: (1) evaluated the proteste...