https://www.gao.gov/products/139676

B-232190.3,B-232190.4: Sep 27, 1989

Two firms requested reconsideration of their denied protests against an Air Force contract award to another firm for a machining center. GAO had held that: (1) the awardee took no exception to the solicitation requirements; (2) whether the awardee supplied a domestically manufactured product was a matter of contract administration, which it would not consider; and (3) the matter was also one of re...

https://www.gao.gov/products/404995

B-232190.3,B-232190.4: Sep 27, 1989

Eligibility under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act is not for resolution by the General Accounting Office. We noted that there was no exception taken by IMTA to the solicitation requirement and concluded that the contracting officer had no information prior to award that was inconsistent with IMTA's commitment to supply a machining center of U.S. or Canadian origin. We added that whether IMTA...