B-232082: Oct 28, 1988

A firm protested an Army solicitation for operation and management services, contending that the solicitation was defective, since it: (1) did not specify the required level of effort; and (2) included a provision for reviewing contractor performance, which was inconsistent with a level-of-effort contract. GAO held that: (1) although the Army l abelled the procurement as requiring a level of effor...

B-232082: Oct 28, 1988

PROCUREMENT - Competitive Negotiation - Requests for proposals - Defects - Allegation substantiation DIGEST: Protest that solicitation calling for award of level of effort contract is defective because it does not specify level of effort required and includes an inspection clause inconsistent with level of effort type contract is without merit where. Multi Services argues that the solicitation is...