https://www.gao.gov/products/136521

B-232059: Aug 9, 1988

A firm protested an Army contract award for laundry services, contending that it should have received the award, since it was entitled to a 10-percent evaluation preference as a small disadvantaged business. GAO held that the evaluation preference did not apply to total small business set-asides. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed...

https://www.gao.gov/products/461308

B-232059: Aug 9, 1988

That award to low bidder on total small business set-aside is contrary to agency policy of granting an evaluation preference to SDB's. Is dismissed because policy does not apply to total small business set- aside. DeHorn was the second low bidder in the procurement. Which was set aside for small businesses. The protester contends that it should receive the award because it is entitled to the benef...