B-231966.2:
Dec 27, 1988
A firm protested an Army contract award for mobile conditioning chambers, contending that the Army: (1) requested product modifications which exceeded its minimum requirements; (2) failed to conduct adequate discussions; (3) evaluated the awardee's proposal using different technical evaluation criteria; and (4) failed to timely provide notice of award. GAO held that the protester: (1) untimely fil...