B-231827:
Oct 12, 1988
A firm protested an Army contract award for maintenance and repair, contending that the Army's evaluation was flawed, since: (1) it used cost rather than technical factors in determining award; (2) its scoring procedures produced an artificial equality in the technical ratings; and (3) it improperly adjusted the protester's bid, resulting in a higher price. GAO held that: (1) the Army's evaluation...