B-231686:
Sep 7, 1988
A firm protested an Army contract award for an air blower and motor, contending that the Army improperly rejected its proposal as technically unacceptable, since: (1) it would have modified its equipment to conform to the specifications; and (2) its bid was low. GAO held that the Army properly: (1) found the protester's bid technically unacceptable, since its equipment did not meet the solicitatio...