B-231366:
May 23, 1988
A firm protested an Army contractor's subcontract award, contending that: (1) the awardee's bid did not meet all of the solicitation requirements; and (2) it would have submitted a bid if it had known that the contractor had relaxed the technical requirements. GAO held that the protester was not sufficiently interested to protest, since it was a prospective subcontractor to an unsuccessful offerer...