https://www.gao.gov/products/142123

B-231061.3: Aug 28, 1990

An Army employee claimed grade and pay retention and a living quarters allowance, despite his previous declination of a lower position. GAO held that the: (1) claimant was not entitled to grade and pay retention, since his separation did not entitle him to reemployment or restoration; and (2) Army should determine the claimant's actual residence in order to determine whether he was a local hire. A...

https://www.gao.gov/products/475737

B-231061.3: Aug 28, 1990

A grade GS-12 employee of the Air Force stationed overseas was subject to a reduction in force. Since the employee did not have a right to reemployment or restoration. We agree with an earlier Office of Personnel Management determination that the employee's discontinued service retirement constituted a break in service and that he is not entitled to grade and pay retention. Employee was denied qua...