B-230886.2:
Jul 28, 1988
A firm protested an Army delivery order award for automatic data processing workstations, contending that the Army: (1) incorrectly calculated the awardee's bid, since it failed to include the cost of optional equipment and misapplied the awardee's quantity discount; and (2) should have awarded it the order, since it submitted the low bid. GAO held that, although the Army incorrectly calculated th...