B-230596: Mar 31, 1988

A firm protested the Army's nonrenewal of its contract for shop floor system maintenance, contending that the Army improperly intended to obtain the services, without resoliciting the requirement, through an existing contract with another firm. The Army contended that the protester untimely filed its protest more than 10 working days after it became aware of the basis for protest. GAO held that th...

B-230596: Mar 31, 1988

PROCUREMENT - Bid Protests - GAO Procedures - Protest Timeliness - 10 Day Rule DIGEST: Where protester's contention that requirement for maintenance services would have to be resolicited rather than included within another contract was rejected and protester was simultaneously informed its contract would be terminated. Its protest filed more than 10 days after such notice is untimely. The protest...