B-229965:
May 16, 1988
A firm protested a Navy contract award for an undersea surveillance system, contending that the Navy: (1) improperly applied cost evaluation criteria; (2) improperly underemphasized the significance of technical factors; and (3) failed to reevaluate the awardee's technical proposal after it significantly reduced its bid. GAO held that the: (1) protester failed to show that the Navy's evaluation pr...