B-228306.2: Feb 25, 1988

A firm requested reconsideration of its denied protest against an Army order for microfilm equipment. GAO had held that the Army properly found the awardee's equipment functionally equivalent to the brand-name equipment. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that the Army improperly omitted a component from its published list of equipment under the schedule contract. GAO held...

B-228306.2: Feb 25, 1988

DIGEST: - Request for reconsideration asserting that contracting agency improperly omitted one component from list published in Commerce Business Daily (CBD) of microfiche equipment to be acquired from schedule contract presents no basis to disturb prior decision denying protest where protester offers no evidence refuting agency's technical determination that component was necessary to meet its mi...