B-228303:
Jan 15, 1988
A firm protested an Army contract award for test units, contending that the Army should have: (1) notified it of an obvious error in its low bid; and (2) allowed it to verify whether it submitted the bid on the basis of first-article approval. GAO held that the: (1) Army improperly determined that award to the second low bidder was most advantageous to the government; (2) Army improperly failed to...